What did Marcus do wrong when he informed a buyer about flood issues?

In this scenario, the key issue revolves around how Marcus conveyed information about flood issues. Committing intentional misrepresentation implies that Marcus knowingly provided false information or omitted critical details about the flood issues that could influence the buyer's decision. This type of conduct is a serious violation of ethical and legal standards in real estate.

Intentional misrepresentation not only undermines the trust between parties in a real estate transaction but also exposes the individual to potential legal consequences. By deliberately misleading the buyer about the flood issues, Marcus would have acted in bad faith, which could be subject to penalties, including loss of licensure or legal action from the affected party.

Understanding this concept is crucial for real estate professionals, as it emphasizes the importance of honesty and transparency in real estate dealings. Buyers rely on agents for accurate information, and any deviation from this responsibility can lead to significant repercussions for both the agent and the buyer in the long run.